The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

The possibility of cognitive Dissonance states that when idiosyncratics are presented with education that implies we act in a way that contradicts our clean standards, we regard excitation (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 191). This is conside redness Cognitive Dissonance.\n\nA psychological term utilize to describe mental dispute that occurs when beliefs or assumptions are contradicted by bracing information; arouses disquiet or tension; sticking out(p) by bingle of some(prenominal) defensive maneuvers: rejecting, explaining away, or avoiding new information; persuading self-importance that no conflict re exclusivelyy exists; accommodative differences; or resorting to any other defensive means of preserving perceptual constancy or order in conception of world and of self; first introduced in mid-fifties; has become major confidential information of discussion and research in psychology (as cited in Comptons Interactive Encyclopedia, 1996).\n\nThis theory was cre ate by Leon Festinger (1957), is concerned with the relationships among cognitions. Cognition, for the persona of this theory, whitethorn be supposition of as a percentage of knowledge, thoughts, feelings, or beliefs. Knowledge may be about an attitude, an emotion, a behavior, or a value. For instance, the position that you like the color red is cognition. People have a massive amount of cognitions at the same time, and these cognitions create irrelevant, relationships with one another. therefore, that the two cognitions have slide fastener to do with each other. This occurs nearly often when we do something that contradicts our moral beliefs.\nIf dissonance is experienced it is well-nigh always uncomfortable, so the respective(prenominal) is motivated to take it. This causes the individual to identify the magnitude of their discomfort and, it is possible to predict what we shtup do to reduce dissonance. There are triple canonic ways to reduce dissonance. start-off are changing cognitions, an pillowcase is if two cognitions dont associate we can modification one to make it relate to the other; or tilt each cognition in the direction of the other. The second is adding cognitions, if two cognitions cause a certain degree of dissonance, adding one or more cognitions can reduce the degree of dissonance. The third is fixing importance, attempting to justify the behavior by adding new cognitions. These are the three basic ways of decrease cognitive dissonance (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 192).\n\nLeon Festinger and crowd Carlsmith also tested his theory in 1959. They put all the participants through a weary task. The task consisted in placing a large number of spools on pegs...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.