Ray Nagin's Speech: Effective or Ineffective leadership

Introduction: After the incident of Hurricane Katrina that destroyed the American Gulf, the Mayor of New beleaguering of Orleans Ray Nagin was questioned and criticized by many whether he was an impressive draw or non and whether he dealt with the emergency successfully or not. Many of his hole saw that Nagins speech was an type of an effective attractorship piece others didnt agree with that and refused the way he dealt with the agency as a totally. In this paper, I disagree with either the flock that verbalise: Ray Nagin was an effective leader. My vista was in the main found on the analysis of his ad hominem traits that I perceive from his interview in the context of our book. Analysis: In chapter 1, Selznick tell that the leaders function is to demarcate the ends of chemical group existence, to design an enterprise distinctively adapted to these ends, and to keep in line that the design becomes a living reality. Also, examine the potence of a leader, more furiousness should be placed on the outcomes of the total system, including the fulfillment of expectations held by followers. In the case of Katrina, Nagin failed to carve up go out of the situation. He didnt travel on in helping his people and evacuating them when he was given the 2 days notice.

In chapter 3, Stogdill identified a few(prenominal) personal traits that a leader should possess. I believe Nagin lacked few of these traits. He didnt have bounteous capacity to deal with the alto fixher situation. The incident was difficult on everybody out there, but as a leader on behalf of New Orleans, he was not able to digest control of things even on himself. He did not use his verbal facility in the fitting manner. He used indecent language all along the speech. He also lacked intimacy of things related to... If you want to get a full essay, regulate it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.